It is essential to remember that sometimes the majority—even the
vast majority—is radically wrong. Our
tradition reminds us of this, and urges us to take precautions.
This
week’s Torah portion, Shelach L’chah
recalls one of those critical moments.
As the Israelites approach their destination, Moses sends twelve scouts
to survey the land of Canaan and then report on how to proceed. All agree that the land is bountiful, but ten
of the twelve argue against crossing the Jordan, fearing the military strength
of its inhabitants. Only two of the
scouts—Joshua and Caleb—dissent, urging the people to have faith and move
forward. The majority wins—and the
nation loses. The Israelites, defying
Moses, choose not to enter the Promised Land—and are thereby condemned to
wander in the wilderness for forty years.
This
experience teaches us to be wary of commonly accepted wisdom, to maintain a
healthy skepticism and to question authority.
This is especially critical, because sometimes the errors of the
majority are compounded by groupthink; outliers are tempted to second guess
themselves and go along with the majority even when they are convinced it is on
the wrong path, just because everyone else is doing so. It must have taken Joshua and Caleb a great
deal of strength and clarity to stand by their position in the face of so much
opposition.
How
do we avoid the pitfall of mindless majoritarianism? Not surprisingly, the Talmud—the great Jewish
compendium of debate and dissent—offers wisdom here. In talmudic argument, one encounters the
Aramaic phrase ipchah mi-stabra. It is invoked when there seems to be a
consensus on an issue—and one of the Sages questions it, suggesting ipchah mi-stabra—just the opposite is, in
fact, the truth. It is a gambit to challenge conventional wisdom and offer
strikingly different perspectives.
This
ancient phrase—and the insight it contains—was famously invoked by the Israeli
military in the aftermath of the Yom Kippur War, which proved the overly
confident pre-war consensus in the intelligence community to be devastatingly
wrong. Citing ipchah mi-stabra, institutions were put into place to reduce the
chances that groupthink and overly dominant commanders would prevent diverse
opinions from reaching decision makers or even being initiated at all. One of these was a unit known as the Devil’s
Advocate office, with a mandate to question any and all proposals coming from
the majority of the defense establishment.
This approach has proven to be very fruitful in the intervening forty
years.
Healthy
skepticism and thinking outside the box have long been strengths of the Jewish
people. This week, question something in
your life that you’ve too long taken for granted. Perhaps—ipchah
mi-stabra—you’ll discover something very different and new.
No comments:
Post a Comment